Comparable

Redesigned comparison experience that dropped 25% in relevant inquiries.

Before

Before

Before

After

After

After

Worked on project as

Lead

designer

Went rapid on this project for

8

weeks

Dropped costs and inquiries by

25

percent

Context

Hillsound is an outdoor gear brand with technical products such as crampons.

As the product line grew, so did customer confusion.

Customers frequently contacted support to ask:

“Which product is right for my use?”

While phone calls were manageable, online inquiries created a direct cost to the business, prompting the team to look for a scalable solution.

Problem

Customers were unable to confidently choose products on their own.

  • High volume of support inquiries

  • Confusion around product differences

  • Existing comparison tool was underutilized

👉 Basically, people weren't able to decide on what product they needed.

What I Found

  1. Customers asked for more specifics.

Through analyzing customer inquiries, I noticed a consistent pattern:

👉 Customers nearly always described their activity + terrain when asking for recommendations.

(85% of which were asking for recommended use)

Choosing the best gaiter for
walking in the bush in snow. - Melissa

terrain

terrain

activity

activity

An example of a submitted inquiry from Melissa.

An example of a submitted inquiry from Melissa.

  1. The existing tool didn't work.

Despite having a comparison feature, it failed in practice.


1: Missing rows + Misaligned data

Shoe Compatibility Comparison

👉 One shows 2 types of shoes while the other shows 5.

The 'Shoe Compatibility' content for all products aren't aligned due to missing rows.

Hillsound’s previous product comparison table with 2 products compared.

Hillsound’s previous product comparison table with 2 products compared.

2: Inconsistent terminology

“Backpacking (ice, mud, snow)” vs "Backpacking"

👉 Customers were asking, "Can this be used for ice, mud and snow too?"

A close-up on the 'Recommended use'. One says Backpacking (ice, snow, mud) whereas another doesn't specify.

A close-up on the 'Recommended use'. One says Backpacking (ice, snow, mud) whereas another doesn't specify.

  1. Information wasn't structured for comparison

The website had some key dependency: Shopify and therefore,

  • Data was managed through separate pages

  • All product specs were written under 1 single input field, "Description"

👉 Shopify couldn’t generate consistent comparison rows

1 input field for all specs

Flow to adding/editing product data.

Flow to adding/editing product data.

Key Insight

The problem wasn’t the lack of a feature but the lack of structured information.

Needs to Goals

reflect how users think (activity + terrain)

support real-world decision making

present consistent, comparable data

improve clarity of product differences

reduce cognitive effort

structure info for easy comparison

Constraints

  • Being built on Shopify, predefined data structure was required

  • Limited UI flexibility due to third-party apps

👉 This required solving both frontend AND backend structure

Solution

  1. Rebuilt the Interface

  • Introduced consistent rows across all products

  • Ensured side-by-side alignment

  • Clear hierarchy in information

👉 Users could now compare products at a glance with clear rows.

Screenshot of the newly improved comparison table; with now rows!

Screenshot of the newly improved comparison table; with now rows!

  1. Collect and Documented the "Right" Information

Working with the industrial designer, I:

  • Defined key attributes (activity, terrain, conditions)

  • Grouped and categorized specifications

  • Ensured consistent terminology across all products

👉 Filled in missing info + ensured consistent specs

Snippet of Excel file to thoroughly document product information (specs).

Snippet of Excel file to thoroughly document product information (specs).

  1. Restructuring Data on Platform

To enable the new experience, I:

  • Learned Shopify's product data system (metafields)

  • Organized specs into structured categories

  • Enabled dynamic rendering of comparison tables

👉 Learned the platform and constraints to arrange info reflecting Hillsound's needs.

Metafield configuration and details for Hillsound's products.

Metafield configuration and details for Hillsound's products.

  1. Displayed Info that Customers Really Wanted

  • Going back to our findings during CX analysis,

"Choosing the best gaiter for walking in the bush in snow." - Melissa

  • Gaiters and crampons are technical products where people have a specific use case they want to use the product in.

👉 Introduced subcategories: Activity, Terrain

Activity

Activity

  • Backpacking

  • Beach/surfing

  • Camping

  • Backpacking

  • Beach/surfing

  • Camping

...

  • Winter walking

  • Urban running

  • Hiking (ice, snow, mud)

  • Backpacking (ice, snow, mud)

  • Winter walking

  • Urban running

  • Hiking (ice, snow, mud)

  • Backpacking (ice, snow, mud)

Recommended Use

Recommended Use

Recommended Use

Recommended Use

Terrain

Terrain

  • Icy Sidewalks

  • Snowy/icy Trails

  • Frozen Lakes

  • Icy Sidewalks

  • Snowy/icy Trails

  • Frozen Lakes

...

3

4

After

After

Before

Before

Previous IA (left) and redesigned IA (right).

Previous IA (left) and redesigned IA (right).

Impact

Within 30 days of launch:

  • 25% reduction in relevant customer inquiries

  • Lower operational costs for customer support

  • Improved user ability to make independent decisions

    (Exact cost savings are confidential)

Reflection

This project reinforced that:

  • UX problems are often system and data problems in disguise

  • Clear information structure is critical for decision-making

  • Designing for real user intent leads to measurable business impact

@2024 Cindy Choi. All rights reserved.

@2024 Cindy Choi. All rights reserved.

@2024 Cindy Choi. All rights reserved.

@2024 Cindy Choi. All rights reserved.

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.